Clinical Efficacy of F4.8 Visual Puncture Minirenal Mirror in the Treatment of Seminal Vesiculitis

Authors

  • Yanan Chen The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Fan Yang The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Dan Shen The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Xin Liu The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Lishun Li Hejian City People’s Hospital, Cangzhou 062450, China
  • Deyan Kong Hejian City People’s Hospital, Cangzhou 062450, China
  • Linan Zhang The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Lianshui Yu Hejian City People’s Hospital, Cangzhou 062450, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62836/amr.v4i1.310

Keywords:

seminal vesiculoscopy, minimally invasive technique, f4.8 visual puncture minirenal mirror, seminal vesiculitis, male urological diseases

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of F4.8 visual puncture minirenal mirror in the treatment of seminal vesiculitis. Methods: A total of 60 patients with seminal vesiculitis admitted to the Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from July 2022 to July 2024 were selected as the study subjects. Patients treated with F4.8 visual puncture minirenal mirror were assigned to the minirenal mirror group (n = 30), while those treated with pharmacotherapy were assigned to the pharmacotherapy group (n = 30). The basic surgical conditions of the minirenal mirror group were analyzed, and the total effective rate at 3 months, as well as improvements in hematospermia, sexual function, pain symptoms, complications, and recurrence rates at 6 months post-treatment, were compared between the two groups. Results: The total effective rate and improvement in sexual function at 6 months post-treatment in the minirenal mirror group were significantly higher than those in the pharmacotherapy group (p < 0.05). The recurrence rate at 6 months post-treatment was lower in the minirenal mirror group than in the pharmacotherapy group (p < 0.05). No significant complications were observed in the pharmacotherapy group during follow-up. In the minirenal mirror group, 13 cases (43.33%) experienced mild hematuria postoperatively, 5 cases (16.67%) had perineal discomfort, and 1 case (3.33%) had fever. Conclusion: F4.8 visual puncture minirenal mirror is a reliable and safe treatment for seminal vesiculitis.

References

Zou F, Zhang GF, Zhang WS, et al. Clinical Efficacy of MRI-Guided Seminal Vesicle Puncture Using F4.8 Visual Minirenal Mirror for the Treatment of Seminal Vesicle Diseases. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine 2024; 17(8): 891–895.

Zhu GY, Zhang ZG, Zhang WD, et al. Anatomical Characteristics of the Seminal Vesicles and Their Significance in Clinical Endoscopic Surgery. Chinese Journal of Andrology 2018; 24(9): 802–806.

Wang YF, Tang H, Chen J, et al. Application and Safety of Minimally Invasive Seminal Vesiculoscopy in the Treatment of Seminal Vesiculitis. Chinese Journal of Sexual Science 2021; 30(6): 29–32.

Wang XL, Zang DW, Zheng LW. Clinical Study on the Treatment of Chronic Hematospermia with “Tonifying Qi and Promoting Blood Circulation” method. Chinese Journal of Sexual Science 2018; 27(12): 120–122.

Wang CY, Zhang KQ, Zhu QQ, et al. Nursing Experience of Seminal Vesiculoscopy for Severe Refractory Hematospermia. Chinese Medical Herald 2014; 9(23): 120–123.

Li SP, Cai JT, Xu ZP, et al. Clinical Comparative Study of Seminal Vesiculoscopy and Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Seminal Vesiculitis. Journal of Modern Urology 2015; 20(2): 93–95.

Jin FS, Li YF. Seminal Vesiculoscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematospermia and Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction. Journal of Clinical Urology 2015; 30(1): 1–5.

Chai KQ, Zhao Q, Gao ZM, et al. Experience in the Application of Seminal Vesiculoscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Seminal Vesicle Diseases. Gansu Medical Journal 2017; 36(3): 223–224.

Xie HD, Jiang T, Wang KN, et al. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Seminal Vesiculoscopy for Distal Genitourinary Tract Diseases. Chinese Journal of Sexual Science 2018; 27(8): 38–42.

Yang SC, Rha KH, Byon SK, et al. Transutricular Seminal Vesiculoscopy. Journal of Endourology 2002; 16(6): 343–345.

Liao LG, Li YF, Zhu T, et al. Clinical Analysis of Endoscopic Treatment for Refractory Hematospermia in 216 cases. Journal of Clinical Urology 2017; (1): 26–31.

Zhu XB, Zhang XS, Zhang SL, et al. 8.5/11.5F Transurethral Seminal Vesiculoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Refractory Hematospermia. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2016; 22(3): 225–228.

Zhao J, Zhai XQ, Li HC, et al. Seminal Vesiculoscopy in the Treatment of Refractory Hemospermia and Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2016; 22(7): 630–634.

Li BJ, Zhang C, Li K, et al. Clinical Analysis of the Characterization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 102 Cases of Refractory Haematospermia. Andrology 2013; 1(6): 948–956.

Han CH, Liang Q, Dong BZ, et al. The Transurethral Seminal Vesiculoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Seminal Vesicle Disease. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 2013; 66(3): 851–853.

Guo JN, Li H, Hu ZD, et al. Clinicopathological Features of Primary Seminal Vesicle Adenocarcinoma: A Report of 4 Cases and Review of the Literature. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2017; 7(23): 639–645.

Downloads

Published

02/19/2025

How to Cite

Yanan Chen, Fan Yang, Dan Shen, Xin Liu, Lishun Li, Deyan Kong, Linan Zhang, & Lianshui Yu. (2025). Clinical Efficacy of F4.8 Visual Puncture Minirenal Mirror in the Treatment of Seminal Vesiculitis. Advanced Medical Research, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.62836/amr.v4i1.310

Issue

Section

Clinical Medicine Research