Causal Effects between Gut Flora Significantly Associated with Cervical Cancer and 1400 Metabolites: A Mendelian Randomized Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62836/amr.v4i1.459Keywords:
cervical cancer, metabolites, gut microbiota, Mendelian RandomizationAbstract
Background: Cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease that substantially affects human health. We investigated the association between metabolites, intestinal flora, and cervical cancer through Mendelian analysis to identify metabolic markers for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer. Methods: Using data from the FinnGen Biobank, MiBioGen, and GWAS catalog, we conducted a causal study linking the gut microbiota to cervical cancer. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) information on gut flora linked to cervical cancer and 1400 metabolites underwent Mendelian analysis. We used inverse variance weighting (IVW), Mendelian Randomization (MR)-Egger, Weighted median (WM), simple mode, and weighted mode for the analysis. Sensitivity analysis included the Cochran Q test, funnel plot, “leave-one-out”, and MR-Egger intercept test. Results: Our findings identified four microbial groups with important causal associations with cervicitis: Pasteurellaceae, Veillonellaceae, Odoribacter, and Bacillales, which showed a positive correlation with cervical cancer. In addition, Pasteurellaceae were positively associated with cervical cancer. In a Mendelian analysis of 1400 blood metabolites, we confirmed 43 metabolites causally linked to Odoribacter, with 20 positively and 23 negatively correlated. Among the 38 metabolites, 27 were positively correlated, and 11 were negatively correlated with Veillonellaceae. For Pasteurellaceae, 44 metabolites were causally associated with 27 positive and 17 negative metabolites. Additionally, 21 metabolites were significantly correlated with Bacillales, with 11 positive and 10 negative correlations. The IVW estimates were significant, and the sensitivity analysis revealed no heterogeneity or pleiotropy. Conclusion: Mendelian studies provide robust evidence for the role of specific metabolites in cervical cancer, showing a causal link with the gut flora. These findings could lead to the development of new diagnostic tools and treatments. However, their clinical application remains unclear, and further research is required to confirm and optimize these ideas. Continued exploration can enhance our understanding of cervical and other cancers, aiding in their prevention and treatment.
References
Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Guido RS, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review. JAMA 2023; 330: 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.13174.
Tjioe KC, Miranda-Galvis M, Johnson MS, et al. The Interaction between Social Determinants of Health and Cervical Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review. Gynecologic Oncology 2024; 181: 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.
020.
Tavakoli F, Khatami SS, Momeni F, et al. Cervical Cancer Diagnosis: Insights into Biochemical Biomarkers and Imaging Techniques. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening 2021; 24: 605–623. https://doi.org/10.2174/
Yang H. The Causal Correlation between Gut Microbiota Abundance and Pathogenesis of Cervical Cancer: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024; 15: 1336101. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fmicb.2024.1336101.
Chang L, Qiu L, Lei N, et al. Characterization of Fecal Microbiota in Cervical Cancer Patients Associated with Tumor Stage and Prognosis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2023; 13: 1145950. https://doi.org10.3389/fcimb.
1145950.
Kang GU, Jung DR, Lee YH, et al. Dynamics of Fecal Microbiota with and without Invasive Cervical Cancer and Its Application in Early Diagnosis. Cancers 2020; 12: 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123800.
Manchester M, Anand A. Metabolomics: Strategies to Define the Role of Metabolism in Virus Infection and Pathogenesis. Advances in Virus Research 2017; 98: 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2017.02.001.
Sitter B, Bathen T, Hagen B, et al. Cervical Cancer Tissue Characterized by High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning MR Spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 2004; 16: 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-003-0025-5.
Zhan YS, Feng L, Tang SH, et al. Glucose Metabolism Disorders in Cancer Patients in a Chinese Population. Medical Oncology 2010; 27: 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9189-9.
Courtnay R, Ngo DC, Malik N, et al. Cancer Metabolism and the Warburg Effect: The Role of HIF-1 and PI3K. Molecular Biology Reports 2015; 42: 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-015-3858-x.
Sun T, Chen X, Yan H, et al. The Causal Association between Serum Metabolites and Lung Cancer Based on Multivariate Mendelian Randomization. Medicine 2024; 103: e37085. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037085.
Chen Y, Lu T, Pettersson-Kymmer U, et al. Genomic Atlas of the Plasma Metabolome Prioritizes Metabolites Implicated in Human Diseases. Nature Genetics 2023; 55: 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01270-1.
Jia Y, Zou K, Zou L. Research Progress of Metabolomics in Cervical Cancer. European Journal of Medical Research 2023; 28: 586. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01490-z.
Wang J, Zhu N, Su X, et al. Gut-Microbiota-Derived Metabolites Maintain Gut and Systemic Immune Homeostasis. Cells 2023; 12: 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050793.
Hu Z, Zhou F, Xu H. Circulating Vitamin C and D Concentrations and Risk of Dental Caries and Periodontitis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2022; 49: 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13598.
Kurilshikov A, Medina-Gomez C, Bacigalupe R, et al. Large-Scale Association Analyses Identify Host Factors Influencing Human Gut Microbiome Composition. Nature Genetics 2021; 53: 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-00763-1.
He M, Xu C, Yang R, et al. Causal Relationship between Human Blood Metabolites and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in Genetics 2024; 15: 1333454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1333454.
Shin SY, Fauman EB, Petersen AK, et al. An Atlas of Genetic Influences on Human Blood Metabolites. Nature Genetics 2014; 46: 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2982.
Yang J, Yan B, Zhao B, et al. Assessing the Causal Effects of Human Serum Metabolites on 5 Major Psychiatric Disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2020; 46: 804–813. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz138.
Sun J, Wang M, Kan Z. Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Literature Review and Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024; 15: 1280983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.
1280983.
Meng C, Sun L, Shi J, et al. Exploring Causal Correlations between Circulating Levels of Cytokines and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. International Journal of Cancer 2024; 155: 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/
ijc.34891.
Castanheira CP, Sallas ML, Nunes RAL, et al. Microbiome and Cervical Cancer. Pathobiology 2021; 88: 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1159/000511477.
Lax A. The Pasteurella Multocida Toxin: A New Paradigm for the Link Between bacterial Infection and Cancer. Pasteurella Multocida: Molecular Biology, Toxins and Infection 2012; 361: 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2012_236.
Bellerba F, Muzio V, Gnagnarella P, et al. The Association between Vitamin D and Gut Microbiota: A Systematic Review of Human Studies. Nutrients 2021; 13: 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103378.
Vallianou N, Christodoulatos GS, Karampela I, et al. Understanding the Role of the Gut Microbiome and Microbial Metabolites in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Perspectives. Biomolecules 2021; 12: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12010056.
Phang JM, Liu W, Hancock CN, et al. Proline Metabolism and Cancer: Emerging Links to Glutamine and Collagen. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 2015; 18: 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/mco.0000000000000121.
Shahzad N, Khan W, Md S, et al. Phytosterols as a Natural Anticancer Agent: Current Status and Future Perspective. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2017; 88: 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.068.
Stary D, Bajda M. Taurine and Creatine Transporters as Potential Drug Targets in Cancer Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023; 24: 3788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043788.
Anderson PM, Lalla RV. Glutamine for Amelioration of Radiation and Chemotherapy Associated Mucositis during Cancer Therapy. Nutrients 2020; 12: 1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061675.
Melone MAB, Valentino A, Margarucci S, et al. The Carnitine System and Cancer Metabolic Plasticity. Cell Death & Disease 2018; 9: 228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0313-7.
Flis Z, Molik E. Importance of Bioactive Substances in Sheep’s Milk in Human Health. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021; 22: 4364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094364.
Doldo E, Costanza G, Agostinelli S, et al. Vitamin A, Cancer Treatment and Prevention: The New Role of Cellular Retinol Binding Proteins. BioMed Research International 2015; 2015: 624627. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/624627.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cong Xu, Yonghong Xu, Guangming Wuang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
