Downloads

https://doi.org/10.62836/emi.v4i1.305
Jieqin Zhou. (2025). Research on the Impact of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies on the Upgrading of China’s Urban Industrial Structure. Economics & Management Information, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.62836/emi.v4i1.305
Volume 4, Issue 1, 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 Jieqin Zhou
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Research on the Impact of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies on the Upgrading of China’s Urban Industrial Structure

The construction of low-carbon cities in China represents a profound socio-economic transformation. This study investigates whether the implementation of low-carbon city pilot projects facilitates industrial structure adjustment. Utilizing panel data from 297 prefecture-level cities spanning 2001 to 2020, this research treats the low-carbon city pilots as a quasi-natural experiment to examine their impact on industrial structure upgrading and the underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that low-carbon city initiatives positively contribute to the optimization of the industrial structure but have a limited effect on its rationalization. Mechanism analysis reveals that green technological innovation driven by pilot projects plays a crucial role in promoting industrial structure upgrading. Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of low-carbon city pilots is more pronounced in central and western regions compared to the eastern region, with no significant effect observed across all three regions collectively. This study offers valuable insights for integrating low-carbon city development with industrial structure upgrading.

low-carbon pilot; industrial structure upgrading; industrial structure rationalization; differentially differential method; green technology innovation

References

  1. Porter MC, Van Der Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1995; 9: 97–118.
  2. Popp D, Newell R. Where Does Energy R&D Come From? Examining Crowding Out from Energy R&D. Energy Economics 2012; 51: 46–71.
  3. Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, et al. Does Environmental Regulation Drive Away Inbound Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics 2016; 123: 73–85.
  4. Hering L, Poncet S. Environmental Policy and Trade Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2014; 68: 296–318.
  5. Greenstone M, Hanna R. Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution and Infant Mortality in India. American Economic Review 2014; 104: 3038–3072.
  6. Guo X, Zhang P, Zhang ZG, et al. Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Structure Upgrading: An Empirical Study on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 238: 634–644.
  7. Zhou X. Semiparametric Estimation for Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Causally Ordered Mediators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodolog 2022; 84: 794–821.
  8. Sun WF. Land Transfer Strategy and Industrial Structure Upgrading Analysis Based on Geographical Externality. Modern Economy 2019; 10: 1134–1152.
  9. Sartzetakis ES, Constantatos C. Environmental Regulation and International Trade. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2005; 8: 61–72.
  10. Lichter A, Pestel N, Sommer E. Productivity Effects of Air Pollution: Evidence from Professional Soccer. Labour Economics 2017; 48: 54–66.
  11. Barros CP, Managi S. French Nuclear Electricity Plants: Productivity and Air Pollution. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2016; 11: 718–724.
  12. Achyuta A, Namrata K, Anan N. Management and Shocks to Worker Productivity: Evidence from Air Pollution Exposure in an Indian Garment Factory. Journal of Political Economy 2022; 130: 1–47.
  13. Lu Y, Yu L. Trade Liberalization and Markup Dispersion: Evidence from China’s WTO Accession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2015; 7: 221–253.
  14. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K. Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review 2009; 99: 1145–1177.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: This research received no external funding.