Downloads

https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.72
Okanga, B. (2023). Explicating Enterprise Modelling As a Driver of the Small and Medium-Scale Manufacturing Enterprises’ Effective Performance. Economics & Management Information, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.72
Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2023
Copyright (c) 2023 Okanga Boniface
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Explicating Enterprise Modelling As a Driver of the Small and Medium-Scale Manufacturing Enterprises’ Effective Performance

Enterprise modelling offers a comprehensive organisational configuration that aids holistic diagnosis to identify and correct areas of deficiencies. This often catalyses a manufacturing entity’s overall effective performance. In that context, this empirical research explores the iterative enterprise modelling’s edifying effects on the small and medium-size manufacturing entities’ (SMEs) effective performance. Using an exploratory case study research design, the empirical research evaluated the perceptions of twenty operational IT support personnel from twenty SMEs that are operating in Glasgow’s manufacturing sector on their level of enterprise modelling’s utilisation as a performance improvement initiative. Even if some of the narratives indicated some of the SMEs that are operating in Glasgow-Scotland to recognise the business values of enterprise modelling, findings still revealed most of the small and medium scale manufacturing entities to only use certain discrete generic operational diagnostic approaches. Such generic operational diagnostic approaches either entailed the use of less technologically-intensive diagnosis of whether a business’ performance is aiding the achievement of the desired outcomes or frequent manufacturing equipments’ diagnosis to minimise risks of major failures that often require complex technologically supported interventions. The study concludes with a framework that explicates the required critical iterative enterprise modelling processes that can be replicated by the small and medium scale manufacturing entities not only in Glasgow, but also across the world.

effective performance enterprise modelling small and medium scale manufacturing enterprises

References

  1. Barone D, Eric Y, Won J, Jiang L, Mylopoulos J. Enterprise Modelling for Business Intelligence; University of Toronto: Toronto, Canada, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16782-9_3
  2. Rizzolo F, Kiringa I, Pottinger R, Wong K. The Conceptual Integration Modelling Framework: Abstracting from The Multidimensional Model. University of Ottawa: Ottawa, Canada, 2010.
  3. Vinodh S, Balaji SR. Fuzzy Logic Based Leanness Assessment and Its Decision Support System. International Journal of Production Research 2010; 4(2): 22–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.492408
  4. Agyapong KKA, Marzanoa S, Ratchev G. The Integrated Use of Enterprise and System Dynamics Modelling Techniques in Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP 2012; 3(1): 543–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.093
  5. Srinoi P, Shayan E, Ghotb F. A Fuzzy Logic Modelling of Dynamic Scheduling in FMS. International Journal of Production Research 2006; 44(44): 2183–2203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500465493
  6. Teece DJ. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 2010; 43(2): 172–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
  7. Giannoulis C, Zikra I, Bergholtz M, Zdravkovic J, Stirna J, Johannesson P. A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Modelling Approaches for Modelling Business Strategy; Stockholm University: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016.
  8. Franke J, Charoy F. El Khoury P. Framework for Coordination of Activities in Dynamic Situations. Enterprise Information Systems 2013; 7(1): 33–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.690891
  9. Chiara G, Kump B, Lindstaed S. A Collaborative Enterprise Modelling Tool; Knowledge Management Institute: Trento, Italy, 2010.
  10. Steward D. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1981; 28(2): 71-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589
  11. Shen H,Wall B, Zarembab M, Chena Y, Browne J. Integration of Enterprise Modeling methods for enterprise information system analysis and user requirements gathering. Computers in Industry 2004; 54(2); 307–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2003.07.009
  12. Panetto H, Cecil J. Information Systems for Enterprise Integration, Interoperability and Networking: Theory and Applications. Enterprise Information Systems 2013; 7(1): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.684802
  13. Turk Z, Mohamad K. A Structured Methodology for Enterprise Modelling: A Case Study for Modelling the Operation of a British Organization; Teesside University: Teesside, UK, 2011.
  14. Jardim‐Gonçalves R, Grilo A. Systematisation of Interoperability Body of Knowledge: the Foundation for EI as a Science. Enterprise Information Systems 2013; 7(1): 7–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.684401
  15. Ulmer JS, Belaud JP, Le Lann JM. A Pivotal‐Based Approach for Enterprise Business Process and IS Integration. Enterprise Information Systems 2013; 7(1): 61–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.700326
  16. Aguilar-Savén SR. Business process modelling: Review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics 2004; 90(2): 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00102-6
  17. Hachani S, Gzara M, Verjus H. A Service‐Oriented Approach for Flexible Process Support Within Enterprises: Application on PLM Systems. Enterprise Information Systems 2013; 7(1): 79–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.688221
  18. Fitkov NE. Literature Overview of Approaches for Enterprise-Wide Modelling, Simulation and Optimisation; Kingston Business School: London, UK, 2010.
  19. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education; Routledge: London, UK, 2011.
  20. Wynn D, Williams CK. Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 2012; 36(3): 787–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41703481
  21. Chen YY, Shek DT, Bu FF. Applications of Interpretive and Constructionist Research Methods in Adolescent Research: Philosophy, Principles and Examples. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 2011; 23(2): 129–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh.2011.022
  22. Bryman A, Bell C. Business Research; Macmillan: London, UK, 2007.
  23. Fetterman S. Three Stages’ Framework for Thematic Analysis. MIS Quarterly 2009; 14(3): 227–233.
  24. Babbie E, Mouton J. The Practice of Social Research; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: N/A