Downloads

https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.82
Barus, D. H. N. (2023). How Social Media Marketing Affecting Brand Equity And Student Engagement in Higher Education Marketing. Economics & Management Information, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.82
Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2023
Copyright (c) 2023 Dianta Hasri Natalius Barus
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How Social Media Marketing Affecting Brand Equity And Student Engagement in Higher Education Marketing

The utilization of social media enables interpersonal communication and user engagement, thereby altering conventional hierarchical communication methods and introducing an unpredictable element into the decision-making process of consumers. Social media marketing is an essential component for organizations seeking to maintain competitiveness, despite being viewed as a part of online marketing. The efficacy of social media promotion is contingent upon the existence of novel products, the market responsiveness of organizations, and the establishment of robust online platforms. Social networking sites such as Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook have become essential instruments for marketers. These platforms are extraordinarily valuable for the promotion of brands and services because they facilitate interactive communication. Social networking sites play a crucial role in the dissemination of information about higher education institutions, serving as effective mechanisms for attracting potential students. The influence of the material disseminated on these online platforms on the cognitive processes of potential students in making decisions is yet to be established. The crucial non-financial advantage of institutions' utilization of social media platforms is the recognition of user engagement. A comprehensive understanding of user involvement across diverse platforms can augment our comprehension of its impact on brand perception. The visual-centric attributes, along with elevated engagement rates among a diverse, young, and international population, have made Instagram a powerful platform for institutions of higher education. The article emphasizes the significance of brand equity within the marketing approach of higher education establishments. The concept of brand equity is subject to the influence of various factors, including but not limited to brand personality, social credibility, and market position. Ensuring the provision of superior amenities and services is imperative for academic institutions. However, the establishment of a proficient communication mechanism is equally vital for enhancing the university's brand positioning and managing the value of its brand efficiently. The notion of 'brand soul' serves as the foundation for this, denoting how the academic institution's faculty and staff personify the brand.

social media brand equity engagement higher education

References

  1. Barker V. Older Adolescents’ Motivations for Social Network Site Use: the Influence of Gender, Group Identity, and Collective Self-Esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12(2): 209–213.
  2. Spaulding TJ. How Can Virtual Communities Create Value for Business?. Electronic Commerce Research and Application 2010; 9(1): 38–49.
  3. Boyd D. Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: the Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008.
  4. Helgesen Ø. Marketing For Higher Education: a Relationship Marketing Approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 2008; 18: 50–78.
  5. Hemsley-Brown JV, Oplatka I. Universities in a Competitive Global Marketplace: a Systematic Review of the Literature on Higher Education Marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2006; 19(4): 316–338.
  6. Robinson S, Wheeler R, Damron T. Higuer Education Institutional Use of Instagram. IGBR Summer Conference 2021 2019; 3(1): 184–188.
  7. Uncles MD. Directions in Higher Education: a Marketing Perspective. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 2018; 26(2): 187–193.
  8. Clark M, Fine MB, Scheuer CL. Relationship Quality in Higher Education Marketing: the Role of Social Media Engagement. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 2017; 27(1): 40–58.
  9. Stamp R. The New Challenge of Branding Buy-in; Education News Winter 2004, 7, Euro RSCG Riley: Dublin, Ireland.
  10. Opoku R, Abratt R, Pitt L. Communicating Brand Personality: Are the Websites Doing the Talking for the Top South African Business Schools? Journal of Brand Management 2006; 14(1): 20–39.
  11. Le TD, Dobele AR, Robinson LJ. Information Sought By Prospective Students From Social Media Electronic Word-of-Mouth During the University Choice Process. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2019; 41(1): 18–34.
  12. Garza E, Royo M. Brand Fan Pages Experience and Strength as Antecedents to Engagement and Intensity of Use to Achieve HEIS’ Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 2019; 29(1): 102–120.
  13. Kinsky ES, Freberg K, Kim C, Kushin M, Ward W. Hootsuite University: Equipping Academics and Future PR Professionals for Social Media Success. Journal of Public Relations Education 2016; 2(1): 1–18.
  14. Constantinides E, Fountain SJ. Web 2.0: Conceptual Foundations and Marketing Issues. Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice 2008; 9(3): 231–244.
  15. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. IEEE Engineering Management Review 2010; 38(3): 16–31.
  16. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the World, Unite! the Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 2010; 53(1): 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
  17. Murray K, Waller R. Social Networking Goes Abroad. International Educator 2007; 16(3): 56–59.
  18. Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS. Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business Horizons 2011; 54(3): 241–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005.
  19. Mangold WG, Faulds DJ. Social Media: the New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix. Business Horizons 2009; 52(4): 357–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002.
  20. Mason R, Rennie F. Using Web 2.0 for Learning in the Community. The Internet and Higher Education 2007; 10(3): 196–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.06.003.
  21. Park N, Kee KF, Valenzuela S. Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12(6): 729–733. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003.
  22. Cheung CMK, Chiu P-Y, Lee MKO. Online Social Networks: Why Do Students Use Facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27(4): 1337–1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028.
  23. DeAndrea DC, Ellison NB, LaRose R, Steinfield C, Fiore A. Serious Social Media: on the Use of Social Media for Improving Students’ Adjustment to College. The Internet and High Education 2012; 15(1): 15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.009.
  24. Nkhoma MZ, Lam TK, Richardson J, Kam BH, Lau C. Developing Case-Based Learning Activities Based on the Revised Bloom’S Taxonomy. InSITE 2016: Informing Science and IT Education Conferences, Vilnius, Lithuania, 27 June–1 July 2016.
  25. Khan RH. Marketing Education Online: a Case Study of New Zealand Higher Education Institutions. 13th International Educational Technology Conference, Malaysia, 26 November 2013.
  26. Brown SA. Marketing Extension Programs, Extension Handbook; University of Guelph: Guelph, Canada, 1984; 141–149.
  27. Nyangau J, Bado N. Social Media and Marketing of Higher Education: a Review of the Literature. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 2012; 8(1): 38–51.
  28. Buhalis D, Mamalakis E. Social Media Return on Investment and Performance Evaluation in the Hotel Industry Context; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2015; 241–253.
  29. Hoffman DL, Fodor M. Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review 2010; 52(1): 41–49.
  30. Peters K, Chen Y, Kaplan AM, Ognibeni B, Pauwels K. Social Media Metrics a Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media. Journal of Interactive Marketing 2013; 27(4): 281–298. DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007.
  31. Barger VA, Labrecque L. An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective on Social Media Metrics. International Journal of Integrated Marketing Communications 2013; 5(1): 64–76.
  32. Gummerus J, Liljander V, Weman E, Pihlström M. Customer Engagement in a Facebook Brand Community. Management Research Review 2012; 35(9): 857–877. DOI:10.1108/01409171211256578.
  33. Malthouse EC, Calder BJ. Comment: Engagement and Experiences: Comment on Brodie, Hollenbeek, Juric, and Ilic (2011). Journal of Service Researc, 2011; 14(3): 277–279. DOI:10.1177/1094670511414584.
  34. Statista. Instagram - Statistics & Facts. 2019. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/ (accessed on 27 May 2023).
  35. Berman N. The Use of Social Networks in a Higher Education Establishment. SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences 2018; 55: 03003. DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20185503003.
  36. Higher Education Marketing. Using Instagram Ads for Higher Education: a How-to for Schools. 2018. Available online: https://www.higher-education-marketing.com/blog/ instagram-ads-higher-education-how-to-schools (accessed on 27 May 2023).
  37. Huang Y-P, Hlongwane N. Kao L-J. Using Sentiment Analysis to Determine Users’ Likes on Twitter. 2018 IEEE 16th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 16th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 4th Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech), Athens, Greece, 12–15 August 2018.
  38. Mourad M, Ennew C, Kortam W. Brand Equity in Higher Education. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 2011; 29(4): 403–20.
  39. Aaker D. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of Brand Name; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  40. Keller K. Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing 1993; 57: 1–22.
  41. Kotler P, Fox K. Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995.
  42. Sharma AA, Rao VR, Popli S. Measuring Consumer-based Brand Equity for Indian Business Schools. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 2013; 23(2): 175–203.
  43. Pinar M, Trapp P, Girard T, Boyt T. University Brand Equity: an Empirical Investigation of Its Dimensions. International Journal of Educational Management 2014; 28(6): 616–34.
  44. WilliamsJr. RL, Omar M. How Branding Process Activities Impact Brand Equity Within Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 2014; 24(1): 1–10.
  45. Byron S. Brand Equity and Market-based Assets of Professional Service Firms. Journal of Professional Services Marketing 1995; 13 (1): 3–7.
  46. Cheng YC, Tam WM. Multimodels of Quality in Education. Quality Assurance in Education 1997; 5(1): 22–31
  47. Kent WE, K Lian, M Khan, J Anene. Colleges’ Hospitality Programmes: Perceived Quality. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 1993; 34(6): 90–97.
  48. Parise S, Guinan PJ. Marketing Using Web 2.0. 41st Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-41 2008), Big Island, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2008.
  49. Barus DHN. How Peer Influence and Social Media Impact on Campus Preference. International Journal of Business and Technology Management 2022; 4(3): 263–273.
  50. Barus DHN. How Trust, Brand Awareness and Digital Marketing Enhance Higher Education Marketing. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management 2023; 5(1): 243–253.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: N/A