Downloads

https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v1i1.196
Tang, M., & Huang, Q. (2024). Crosslinguistic Influence of Topic and Subject Prominence Distinction on L2 Acquisition and Processing. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v1i1.196
Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2024

Crosslinguistic Influence of Topic and Subject Prominence Distinction on L2 Acquisition and Processing

The distinction between topic-prominent languages (TPL) and subject-prominent languages (SPL) was first proposed by Li and Thompson and has since been widely accepted by linguists as a typology to classify languages. The introduction of the notion of topic prominence into the research field of SLA triggered a wealth of studies. Empirical researches of crosslinguistic influence have been conducted from different directions (i.e., topic-prominence (TP) to subject-prominence (SP), or SP to TP) via behavioral or electrophysiological methods, with participants from various L1 backgrounds and language proficiency, but the findings on how the typological distinction functions in L2 acquisition and processing are inconsistent. This paper sorts out and compares the TP and SP features, reviews the previous researches on the transfer of TP and SP features, and comments on its research content and methods.

topic prominent subject prominent second language acquisition second language processing

References

  1. Li C., Thompson S. Subject and topic: A new typology of languages. In: C. N. Li (Ed.), Mandarin Chinese, Academic Press: New York, USA.1976, pp. 457–489.
  2. Xu L., Langendoen D.T. Topic Structures in Chinese. Language, 1985; 61: 1–27.
  3. Shi D. Topic and Topic-Comment Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 2000;76(2): 383–408.
  4. Pan H., Hu J. A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 2009; 40: 1966–1981.
  5. Schachter J., Rutherford W. Discourse function and language transfer. Working papers in bilingualism, 1979; 19: 1–12.
  6. Rutherford, W. Language typology and language transfer. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 1983, pp. 358–470.
  7. Fuller J.W., Gundel J.K. Topic-prominence in interlanguage. Language Learning, 1987, 37(1), 1–17.
  8. Givón T. Universals of discourse structures and second language acquisition. In: W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins， 1984， pp. 109–137.
  9. Huebner T. A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English (Ph.D. thesis). Ann Arbor: University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1983.
  10. Sasaki M. Topic prominence in Japanese EFL students’ existential constructions. Language Learning 1990; 40(3):337–368.
  11. Hendriks H. The acquisition of topic marking in L1 Chinese and L1 and L2 French. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 2000; 22: 369–397.
  12. Gao J., Dai M. Acquisition study on the topic structures by Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2009; 32(1): 62–69.
  13. Yip V., Matthews S. Interlanguage and typology: the case of topic-prominence in L. Eubank, L. Selinker and M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1995.
  14. Green C. The origins and effects of topic-prominence in Chinese-English interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1996; 34(2), 119–135.
  15. Cai Y. Transfer of Topic Structure - Analysis of Zero Subject Phenomenon in English. Foreign Language Education, 2002, (4): 1–6.
  16. Zhang A., Su X. Topic-prominent structures and Chinese-English interlanguage. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2002, (4)： 30–37.
  17. Liu F. Topicalization in English Cross-Language Writing. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology (Social Sciences), 2003, (3): 149–153.
  18. Yip V. Interlanguage and learnability: from Chinese to English (Ph.D. dissertation). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1995.
  19. Han Z. Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: the case of the pseudo-passive, Applied Linguistics, 2000, 21(1): 78–105.
  20. Yang L., Yu S. A typological explanation of pseudo-passive structures in interlanguage. Journal of ocean university of China (social sciences edition), 2005, (2): 56–61.
  21. Yang, L. (2008). Topic Prominence in Typological Interlanguage Development of Chinese Students’ English (Ph.D dissertation). Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Studies University.
  22. Stoecker K. Transfer of Topic-Prominence in Chinese-English Interlanguage. Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University, 2013.
  23. Li S. An investigation into the influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of passive voice. Cambridge Journal of China Studies, 2014, 9： 109–121.
  24. Wang Y. Chinese topic prominence and pseudo-passive constructions in interlanguage. Journal of Ningbo university (liberal arts edition), 2010, 23(5)： 58–61.
  25. Li S., Yang L. Topic prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2014a, 4： 109–125.
  26. Li S., Yang L. A discourse perspective of topic-prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ interlanguage. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2014b, 3： 190–197.
  27. Cai J.T. The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on Chinese EFL learners’ compositions. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1998a, 4(3): 17–21.
  28. Cai J. T. L1 Transfer and Topic-prominence Structure. Journal of Jiefangjun University of Foreign Languages, 1988b, 6(3): 15–19.
  29. Chen C. The influence of Chinese Topic Prominence Construction on English Acquisition (Doctoral dissertation). Kristianstad, Sweden: Kristianstad University， 2011.
  30. Chang H., Xu L., Zheng L. Transfer and unlearning of topic prominence by Chinese learners of English. Modern foreign languages (bimonthly), 2017, 40(1): 47–56.
  31. Jin H. Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: evidence of English-to Chinese typological transfer. Language learning, 1994, 44(1): 101–122.
  32. Mu Z. Topic-comment constructions in the acquisition of Chinese as a second/foreign language (Ph.D dissertation). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois， 1994.
  33. Yuan B. Acquisition of Base-Generated Topics by English-Speaking Learners of Chinese. Language Learning, 1995, 45(4): 567–603.
  34. Liu F. Acquiring topic structures in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2015, 4(1): 1-21.
  35. Cao X., Yang S., Huang Y., Gao L., Cui X. Acquisition study of topic sentence in Chinese as a second language. Chinese Teaching in the World, 2006; 3: 86–102.
  36. Caffarra S., Molinaro N., Davidson D., Carreiras M. Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2015, 51: 31–47.
  37. MacWhinney B. Bates E. Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.),The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing， New York: Cambridge University Press, USA, 1989, pp. 3–73.
  38. Clahsen H., Felser C. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2006, 27(1): 3–42.
  39. Yuan B. Can L2 sentence processing strategies be native-like? Evidence from English speakers’ L2 processing of Chinese base-generated-topic sentences. Lingual, 2017, 191-192: 42–64.
  40. Song K., Chang H., Wang Y. Processing of Chinese Base-Generated-Topic Sentences by L1-Korean Speakers: An Eye-Tracking Study. Brain Sciences, 2022, 12(11): 1573.
  41. Zeng T., Li Y., Wu M. Processing of Chinese Topic Structures by Vietnamese L2 Learners. Modern Foreign Languages, 2021, 44(1): 62–73.

Supporting Agencies

  1. This study was supported by Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462023YXZZ006), Undergraduate Key Teaching Reform Project (30GK2312), and Graduate Teaching Reform Project (YJS2021048).