Downloads

https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i1.295
Yu, Z., Nuttamon Punchatree, & Wichian Irtarasompun. (2025). Application of Modern Educational Technology in the Teaching Management of Secondary School Teachers in Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i1.295
Volume 2, Issue 1, 2025

Application of Modern Educational Technology in the Teaching Management of Secondary School Teachers in Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

This study investigates the application of modern educational technology in teaching management among middle school teachers in Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. A questionnaire was administered to 140 teachers from the Second Middle School of Hengxian County. Data analysis using statistical methods revealed that teachers generally recognize and accept modern educational technology. However, challenges remain, including teachers’ awareness, incomplete hardware and software, lack of integration with the curriculum, and individual teachers’ technological proficiency. The study found that modern educational technology enhances teaching efficiency by extending time and space, increasing interaction among stakeholders, and transforming abstract knowledge into more accessible forms. Despite these advantages, issues such as information redundancy and weak boundary awareness persist. Recommendations include improving teachers’ awareness and skills, updating facilities, and conducting regular training to enhance educational technology integration. Creating a collaborative atmosphere between teachers and students is also suggested to improve overall teaching management efficiency.

modern educational technology; teaching management; the modern educational technology competence of secondary school teachers

References

  1. Smith D. Transforming Teaching Management: The Hybrid Approach with Modern Educational Technology. International Journal of Educational Technology 2020; 25(1): 56–72.
  2. Johnson B. Limitations of Traditional Teaching Management: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Educational Practices 2019; 38(4): 321–335.
  3. Brown A, Green C. Modern Educational Technology: Enhancing Knowledge Delivery and Student Learning Experiences. Educational Technology Journal 2021; 45(2), 123–145.
  4. Wang X. The Application of Modern Educational Technology in the Teaching Management of Secondary School Teachers and Its Role in Enhancing Teaching Management. Master’s Thesis, 2022.
  5. Chen X. The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Teaching Management Enhanced by Modern Educational Technology. Journal of Educational Technology 2021; 48(3): 125–142.
  6. Zhang Y. The Role of Modern Educational Technology in Online Teaching and Learning during the Epidemic. International Journal of Online Education 2022; 7(1): 45–60.
  7. Lee S. Digital Tools and Resources in Teaching Management for Secondary School Teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 2020; 28(2): 85–100.
  8. Kim T. Teaching Management: Teachers’ Planning, Classroom Management, and Evaluation Activities. Journal of Educational Management 2021; 15(3): 120–135.
  9. Piaget J. The Psychogenesis of Knowledge and Its Epistemological Significance. In Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 1–13.
  10. Bruner JS. The Process of Education; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1961.
  11. Duffy TM, Jonassen DH. Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction; Routledge: London, UK, 2013.
  12. Brooks JG, Brooks MG. In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Arlington, VA, USA, 1993.
  13. Bednar AK, Cunningham D, Duffy TM, et al. Theory into Practice: How Do We Link? In Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 17–34.
  14. Jonassen DH. Objectivism Versus Constructivism: Do We Need a New Philosophical Paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development 1991; 39(3): 5–14.
  15. Clements DH, Sarama J. Effects of a Preschool Mathematics Curriculum: Summative Results of the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2007; 38(2): 136–163.
  16. Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record 2006; 108(6): 1017–1054.
  17. Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT. Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2010; 42(3): 255–284.
  18. Tam M. Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology & Society 2000; 3(2): 50–60.
  19. Gardner H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  20. Gardner H. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  21. Fogarty R, Stoehr J. Integrating Curricula with Multiple Intelligences: Teams, Themes, and Threads; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008.
  22. Thomas JW. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning; Autodesk Foundation: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000.
  23. Armstrong T. Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom, 3rd ed.; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Arlington, VA, USA, 2009.
  24. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2009; 9(1): 60–70.
  25. Gardner H, Moran S. The Science of Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist 2006; 41(4): 227–232.
  26. Spector JM, Yuen HK. Toward Useful and Effective Educational Technology Research and Development. Educational Technology Research and Development 2016; 64(6): 1111–1118.
  27. Collins A. Towards a Design Science of Education. In New Directions in Educational Technology; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992.
  28. Nguyen TT, Chung CQ. The Roles of Educational Technology during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 2020; 19(6): 289–302.
  29. Costa C, Figueiredo V, Morais R. Decolonizing Educational Technology: Knowledge Justice and Cultural Diversity in the Educational Process. Postdigital Science and Education 2022; 4(3): 745–762.
  30. Sims P, Stone S. Educational Technology. In The Practical Guide to Instructional Design; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 127–142
  31. Li X, He Y. The Importance of Information Technology Networks in Improving Teachers' Professional Skills. Journal of Educational Technology 2023; 45(2): 123–135.
  32. Jin L, Wang M, Zhang Y. Enhancing teaching effectiveness through modern educational technology in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2022; 23(4): 567–578.
  33. Wang H. Creating a Rich and Interactive Teaching Environment through Multimedia and Internet Resources. Educational Technology and Society 2023; 26(1), 78–89.
  34. He Q. A New Definition of Educational Technology: Theory and Practice of Designing, Developing, Utilizing, Managing, and Evaluating Education Processes and Resources. British Journal of Educational Technology 2023; 54(3): 345–356.
  35. Liu HB. Improvement, Refinement, Modernization and Standardization of Teaching Management in Middle Schools. Journal of Educational Management 2021; 15(2): 45–56.
  36. Qu N. Modernization of Teaching Management in Rural Junior High Schools in Western China: A Case Study of Q Junior High School. Rural Education Research 2020; 12(3): 78–89.
  37. Zhang SY. Application Status and Strategy of Information Technology in Secondary School Teaching Management: A Case Study of Zhongshan City. Educational Technology Research 2015; 10(4): 67–78.
  38. Nurhidayat E, Mujiyanto J, Yuliasri I, et al. Technology Integration and Teachers’ Competency in the Development of 21st-Century Learning in EFL Classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) 2024; 18(2), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21069.
  39. Durak H, Saritepeci M. Investigating the Effect of Technology Use in Education on Classroom Management within the Scope of the FATIH Project. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2017; 46(2): 441–457. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.303511.
  40. Graham MA, Stols G, Kapp R. Teacher Practice and Integration of ICT: Why Are or Aren’t South African Teachers Using ICTs in Their Classrooms. International Journal of Instruction 2020; 13(2): 749–766. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13251a.
  41. Napal Fraile M, Peñalva-Vélez A, Mendióroz Lacambra AM. Development of Digital Competence in Secondary Education Teachers’ Training. Education Sciences 2021; 8(3): 104.
  42. Liu SH. Factors Related to Pedagogical Beliefs of Teachers and Technology Integration. Computers & Education 2011; 56(4): 1012–1022.
  43. Jang S, Tsai M. The TPACK Model and Its Application to Elementary Mathematics and Science Teachers in Taiwan. Computers & Education 2012; 59(4): 1202–1211.
  44. Robertson J. Over-reliance on technology and its impact on student initiative and creativity. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2011; 40(1), 5–18.
  45. Mayes T, de Freitas S. Technology-Enhanced Learning. In Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Perspective; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
  46. Guitert M, Romeu T, Baztán P. A Digital Competence Framework for K-12 Teachers: Integrating Pedagogical and Technological Dimensions. Computers & Education 2021; 163: 104099.
  47. Ghateolbahra A, Samimi F. Classroom Management Strategies in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Novice and Experienced Teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 2021; 69(4): 1895–1918.
  48. Livingston A. Technological Barriers in Education. Journal of Educational Technology 2017; 45(2): 123–145.
  49. Martz MA, Shepherd KG. Teacher Unfamiliarity with Technology: Implications for Teaching Management. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2007; 39(4): 361–375.
  50. Zhang H, Tian MF. Reliability Analysis in Survey Questionnaire Design. Statistics and Decision 2007; (21): 25–27.
  51. Darmawansah D, Hwang GJ, Chen MRA, et al. Trends and Research Foci of Robotics-Based STEM Education: A Systematic Review from Diverse Angles Based on the Technology-Based Learning Model. International Journal of STEM Education 2023; 10(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3.
  52. Liu SY. Teachers’ Educational Beliefs and Technology Integration. Teaching and Teacher Education 2011; 27(5): 1086–1093.
  53. Huang B, Jong MSY, Chai CS. Design and Implementation of a Video-Facilitated Transdisciplinary STEM Curriculum in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic. Educational Technology & Society 2022; 25(1): 108–123.
  54. Fullan M, Quinn J, McEachen J. Deep learning: Engage the World Change the World; Corwin: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018.
  55. Howland JL, Jonassen D, Marra RM. Meaningful Learning with Technology, 4th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2011.
  56. Morris J, Song Y, Soloway E, et al. Teacher Professional Development in STEM Education. Journal of Educational 2021; 24: 81–85.
  57. Lee WC, Lai CL. Facilitating Mathematical Argumentation by Gamification: A Gamified Mobile Collaborative Learning Approach for Math Courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2024; 22: 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10462-6.
  58. Huang B, Jong MSY, Tsai CC, et al. Unlocking Students’ Creative Potential in Designing Technological-Enriched Design Solutions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2024; 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2342915.
  59. Geng X, Su YS. Enhancing K-12 Students’ STEM Learning through the Integration of the Metaverse into Online and Blended Environments: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2024; 22: 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10484-0.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: This research received no external funding.