Downloads
Download

AI-Empowered Learning Ecology Under China’s ‘Double Reduction’ Policy
China’s 2021 “Double Reduction” policy reduces student academic burdens and regulates tutoring, yet challenges remain in equitable education access and student well-being. This study proposes a digital education model—the Health Learning Chain (HLC)—using biological-behavioral big data to optimize learning through physiological, psychological, and behavioral insights. Employing mixed methods (interviews, surveys, and system dynamics modeling), it explores multi-agent collaboration and resource sharing in sports-education integration. Key findings highlight stakeholder cooperation and resource optimization as vital for success. Policy simulations show short-term gains from increased resources but emphasize long-term reliance on governance and policy support. Recommendations include boosting resources, enhancing collaboration, and establishing sustainable policy frameworks, offering actionable strategies for a balanced educational ecosystem under “Double Reduction”.
References
- Sun Y. Analyzing the Impact of the “Double Reduction” Policy on Student Well-Being and Academic Performance in Urban China. Research and Advances in Education 2024; 3(9): 80–86.
- Ma S. Research on the Implementation of the Double Reduction Policy Enabled by Digitalization. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2024), Ningbo, China, 11–13 October 2024.
- Lin L, Zhou D, Wang J, et al. A Systematic Review of Big Data Driven Education Evaluation. SAGE Open 2024; 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242180.
- Williamson B. Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920.
- Buinytska O, Smirnova V, Terletska T, et al. Theoretical Exploration of the Design of the Open University Ecosystem and Its Security Challenges within the Realm of Digital Transformation. CPITS-II 2024: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems II 2024 2024; (3826): 115–128.
- Rasmussen EB, Clay CJ, Pierce WD, et al. Behavior Analysis and Learning: A Biobehavioral Approach; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2022.
- Ruiu P, Nitti M, Pilloni V, et al. Metaverse & Human Digital Twin: Digital Identity, Biometrics, and Privacy in the Future Virtual Worlds. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2024; 8(6): 48.
- Sterman, J. Business Dynamics—System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2000; 53(4): 472–473.
- Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006; 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017.
- Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed.; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2018.
- Barlas Y. Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics. System Dynamics Review 1996; 12(3): 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4.
- Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2008; 18(4): 543–571.
- Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence T. Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 2003; 40: 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00342.
Supporting Agencies
- Funding: This research received no external funding.