Downloads

https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i2.467
Jiang, S., & Fugen Yu. (2025). Integrating Ideological and Political Education Across Educational Levels: A Social Integration Approach. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i2.467
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025

Integrating Ideological and Political Education Across Educational Levels: A Social Integration Approach

Existing mechanisms are no longer adequate to meet contemporary demands for “collaborative education” combining ideological and political education. Contemporary social theory provides a scientific basis for understanding and guiding social change. This paper explores a collaborative mechanism for integrated ideological and political education in primary, secondary, and higher education from the perspective of social integration theory with the goal of unifying educational goals and achieving continuity in the educational process. The collaborative mechanism requires action at three levels–macro-level policy support, meso-level management collaboration, and micro-level innovation–to promote effective cooperation and resource sharing among educational stakeholders. Continuously improving the collaborative mechanism for ideological and political education will facilitate social development and instill young people with a sense of social responsibility, innovative spirit, and practical ability.

ideological and political education social integration collaborative mechanism integration

References

  1. Liu YJ, Wang W. An exploration of Ideological and Political Education in Maintaining the Ideological and Political Safety of Colleges and Universities. Research on Ideological and Political Education 2022; 38(2): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15938/j.cnki.iper.2022.02.013.
  2. Shi S, Han X. Construction of the “Great Ideological and Political Course” synergy Mechanism: Problems and Strategies. Theory and Education 2022; 6(1): 71–76.
  3. Zhong QD. The ideological logic of ideological and political education. Research on Ideological Education 2023; 1(1): 43–49.
  4. Durkheim É. The Division of Labor in Society; Qu D, Translator; Sanlian Bookstore: Shanghai, China, 2000.
  5. Brady ZR. Personality and Society as Interpenetrating Action Systems: A Review and Assessment of Talcott Parsons’ Personality Development—Socialization Theory; University of Texas: Dallas, TX, USA, 1963.
  6. Book Tönnies F. Community and Society; Lin R, Translator; The Commercial Press: Beijing, China, 1999.
  7. Liu HT. The Sinofication of Tönnies’ “Community” Theory and Its Ontemporary Significance: On the Innovative Development of the Theoretical Construction of the Chinese National Community. Journal of North Minzu University 2021; 1: 11–18.
  8. Wu XL. The Origin and Development of Social Integration Theory: An Examination of Foreign Research. Foreign Theoretical Dynamics 2013; 1(2): 37–46.
  9. Sun J, Qiu Y. From Political Party to Society: The Mechanism of the Formation of the Organizational Advantage of the Communist Party of China from the Perspective of Social Integration Theory. Administration and Law 2023; (9): 14–24. https://doi.org/ 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8207.2023.09.002.
  10. Yang LY. The Three Basic Dimensions of Community in Habermas’s Social Integration Theory. Philosophical Researches 2019; 10: 116–125.
  11. Zhao BY, Wang JX. Multidimensional Reflection on Ideological and Political Education Facing Individual Needs in the New Era. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2024; 26(2): 70–78.
  12. Yang XH, Gong ZM. Promoting the integrated construction of ideological and political education in primary, secondary, and higher education in the new era. Ideological and Theoretical Education Guide 2023; (1): 119–125.
  13. Xu RF, Shang WW, Zhang ZX. Development Report on the Integrated Construction of Ideological and Political Courses in Primary, Secondary, and Higher Education; East China Normal University Press: Shanghai, China, 2023; pp. 52–53.
  14. Huang WL. On Ideological and Political Education as Spiritual Production. Research on Ideological and Political Education 2024; 2024(01): 31–38.
  15. Hai Y, Chen J. Progress, hotspot analysis, and future prospects of family-school-society collaborative education in the past decade: A visualization analysis based on CiteSpace. Early Education 2024; 2024(24): 50–56.
  16. Meng LJ. Home-School Co-Education: Promoting “I Grow Up with My Child”. Chinese Journal of Moral Education 2018; 2018(15): 35–38.
  17. Shen HY. Approaches and Strategies for the Implementation of Moral Education Management in Junior High Schools. Gansu Educational Research 2022; (3): 50–52.
  18. Song FM. Theoretical Research on the Construction of Ideological and Political Education Context. Ph.D. Thesis, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2021. https://doi.org/10.27149/d.cnki.ghdsu.2021.002841.
  19. Gao Y. Constructing the Ecosystem of Ideological and Political Education in Open Universities from the Perspective of Symbiosis Theory. Journal of Nanjing Open University 2024; 2024(02): 61–66.
  20. Xu Y. Family Socioeconomic Status, Social Support, and College Students’ Sense of Happiness. Youth Research 2017; (1): 47–56+95.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: This research received no external funding.