Downloads

https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i2.521
Hong, T. (2025). Ethnic Variations in Muscle Mass and Strength: Evidence, Gaps, and Future Directions. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.62836/jissh.v2i2.521
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025

Ethnic Variations in Muscle Mass and Strength: Evidence, Gaps, and Future Directions

Muscle strength and size vary widely among individuals and populations. This paper examines factors contributing to these differences with a focus on ethnic disparities. A literature-based synthesis was conducted using peer-reviewed studies examining differences in muscle physiology between ethnicities. While the literature shows that major differences across different ethnicities exist, the underlying causes remain poorly understood. Factors such as cultural diets as well as muscle quality are proposed as potential contributors. Socioeconomic status (SES) has also been considered, but contradictory findings suggest it is not a primary factor, suggesting deeper biological and cultural influences. These insights are relevant for developing equitable training, rehabilitation, and healthcare strategies tailored to diverse populations.

muscle strength muscle size muscle health ethnic differences exercise physiology interethnic variation

References

  1. Araujo AB, Chiu GR, Kupelian V, et al. Lean Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function in a Diverse Population of Men: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 508.
  2. Melvin MN, Smith-Ryan AE, Wingfield HL, et al. Evaluation of Muscle Quality Reliability and Racial Differences in Body Composition of Overweight Individuals. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2014; 40(9): 1973–1979.
  3. Rahman M, Berenson AB. Racial Difference in Lean Mass Distribution among Reproductive-Aged Women. Ethnicity & Disease 2010; 20(4): 346–352.
  4. Shaffer NC, Simonsick EM, Thorpe RJ Jr, et al. The Roles of Body Composition and Specific Strength in the Relationship between Race and Physical Performance in Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2019; 75(4): 784–791.
  5. Kuschel LB, Sonnenburg D, Engel T. Factors of Muscle Quality and Determinants of Muscle Strength: A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare 2022; 10(10): 1937.
  6. Hopwood HJ, Bellinger PM, Compton HR, et al. The Relevance of Muscle Fiber Type to Physical Characteristics and Performance in Team-Sport Athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2023; 18(3): 223–230.
  7. Ouyang Y, Huang F, Zhang X, et al. Association of Dietary Protein Intake with Muscle Mass in Elderly Chinese: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2022; 14(23): 5130.
  8. Davis JA, Mohebbi M, Collier F, et al. The Role of Diet Quality and Dietary Patterns in Predicting Muscle Mass and Function in Men Over a 15-Year Period. Osteoporosis International 2021; 32(11): 2193–2203.
  9. Duchowny KA, Diaz-Ramirez LG, Boscardin WJ, et al. The Neighborhood Environment and Handgrip Strength: Longitudinal Findings from the Health and Retirement Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2024; 79(11): glae242.
  10. Tian Y, Zhong F, Li C, et al. Association between Parental Socioeconomic Status and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Chinese College Students: Fitness Improvement Tactics in Youths (FITYou) Project. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2020; 13: 2457–2467.
  11. Freeston J, Gale J, Mavros Y, et al. Associations between Multiple Indicators of Socio-Economic Status and Muscle-Strengthening Activity Participation in a Nationally Representative Population Sample of Australian Adults. Preventive Medicine 2017; 102: 44–48.
  12. Liang MTC, Bassin S, Dutto D, et al. Bone Mineral Density and Leg Muscle Strength in Young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian Women. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2007; 10(2): 157–164.

Supporting Agencies

  1. Funding: This research received no external funding.